Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Acute and sub-acute toxicity studies on an antidiabetic polyherbal formulation in mice

Syamsudin Abdillah1 , Safira Nafisa2, Qonita S Dewi1

1Department of Pharmacology; 2Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Pancasila, Jl. Srengseng Sawah, Jagakarsa, South Jakarta 12640, Indonesia.

For correspondence:-  Syamsudin Abdillah   Email: syamsudin.abdillah@univpancasila.ac.id

Accepted: 19 May 2021        Published: 30 June 2021

Citation: Abdillah S, Nafisa S, Dewi QS. Acute and sub-acute toxicity studies on an antidiabetic polyherbal formulation in mice. Trop J Pharm Res 2021; 20(6):1171-1178 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v20i6.11

© 2021 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the acute and sub-acute toxicity of an Indonesian polyherbal formulation in experimental mice.
Methods: Young and healthy Swiss albino mice of both sexes (5 – 6 weeks old), weighing 24 – 25 g were used in this study. Acute toxicity test was conducted in the mice using OECD 425 method and AOT425StatPgm software to determine the polyherbal formulation’s lethal dose (LD50) value, while the sub-acute toxicity test was performed for 28 days using OECD 407 method, by measuring hematological and clinical biochemistry parameters, as well as examining the histology of the liver and kidneys. The acute toxicity test consisted of the following dose groups: 175, 550, 1750 and 5000 mg/kg, while sub-acute toxicity test dose groups were 200, 400 and 800 mg/kg. Each group consisted of 5 male and 5 female mice.
Results: Based on the results obtained, LD50 value of the polyherbal formula was >5000 mg/kg. Repeated doses for 28 days showed significant differences (p < 0.05) for white blood cells (WBC) and platelet parameters in male mice, and for mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and platelet parameters in female mice. However, the values were within normal limits. With regard to clinical biochemical parameters - aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, and albumin - there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the test groups. Furthermore, no changes were observed in their histological features.
Conclusion: The evaluated polyherbal formulation can be considered safe for use in mice. However, clinical trials in diabetic patients at the proposed doses are required to ascertain the formulation’s safety profile.

Keywords: Polyherbal, Antidiabetic, Acute and subacute toxicity, Safety

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates